Reuters' Nita Bhalla is, of course,
just an honest broker of the news;
Debroy, a
free-market ideologue, said people had to be careful when focusing on
goals and should not make "value judgments" on people's lifestyle.
Our bold in the above. Nita is passing judgment on Indian economist Bibek Debroy, who as an adviser to the Indian government had the temerity to criticize some United Nations' initiative as overly ambitious, at a press conference;
"I am going to provoke my hosts, but I am greatly disturbed
by what is happening on the SDGs. Eight goals, 21 targets, I can
understand. But 17 goals, 169 targets? We'll go nuts. Imagine the plight
of the countries which will now have to collect data for these, if
collecting that data at all is possible," he said.
'SDGs', you ask? ' Well, the 's' is for 'sustainable'.
World
leaders are due to adopt a set of new development objectives in
September, to replace eight expiring U.N. Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs). These will include objectives like ending poverty, reducing
child mortality and tackling climate change.
The one thing that has been sustainable for many, many decades is the ability of UN paychecks to arrive on time, for the people who are always setting goals for everyone else. But, you're an ideologue if you say;
"For
example, should people have piped drinking water? Everyone will say
yes. But in India in 2001, 45,000 villages had populations less than
100, some of those villages are in hilly areas where they get perfectly
clean drinking water from streams," he said.
"So what is the objective? Is it to get drinking water from taps or just to get clean drinking water?"
Maybe the people themselves could decide.
No comments:
Post a Comment