'We're not monopsonists'--
contrary to Menzie Chinn's delusions--'in the labor markets.' So, to offset higher wages to be paid,
Wal-Mart needs its suppliers to cut its costs;
The retailing behemoth says it has been telling suppliers to forgo
investments in joint marketing with the retailer and plow the savings
into lower prices instead. Makers of branded consumer products from
diapers to yogurt typically earmark a portion of their budgets for
marketing with Wal-Mart, spending on things like eye-catching product
displays and online advertisements.
Wal-Mart has long had a
reputation for pressing its suppliers to cut costs to help lower prices,
but the retailer’s new leadership has embraced the concept with fresh
vigor.
At a recent meeting with its suppliers, CEO Doug McMillon made his proposal, because;
With the heavy investments related to its promise to raise wages and
the development of a vast e-commerce business, Wal-Mart has fewer
options for chipping away at costs, putting suppliers in the cross
hairs.
Meaning someone has to absorb those higher labor costs. Wal-Mart would prefer that it be its suppliers, no surprise. Whether or not that will be the case will be worked out in the marketplace, but if Wal-Mart was truly a monopsonist they wouldn't be in this position.
No comments:
Post a Comment