Or, Math class is still hard,
says the OECD (and presumably Larry Summers);
Despite decades of global efforts to get more young women to study
and pursue careers in math and science, girls still lag behind their
male classmates in terms of academic performance and career aspirations
in STEM-related fields.
Using results from a 2012 assessment
given to about a half-million 15-year-olds around the world, a new
report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
finds that even though more boys struggled to show basic proficiency in
reading, math and science than did girls, boys still ultimately
outperformed girls in math. The gap was widest at the top, with
high-achieving boys scoring significantly higher than the top girls.
Which explains why so many more men than women have jobs at top research universities in the sciences. Anyone
have the vapours? (From 2005);
Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers has triggered criticism by telling
an economics conference Friday that the under-representation of female
scientists at elite universities may stem in part from “innate"
differences between men and women, although two Harvard professors who
heard the speech said the remarks have been taken out of context in an
ensuing national media frenzy.
MIT biologist Nancy Hopkins ’64 said
she felt physically ill as a result of listening to Summers’ speech at a
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) luncheon, and she left the
conference room half-way through the president’s remarks.
No comments:
Post a Comment